I ran across an interesting post over at the DomainGang.com blog about the recent sale of Retweet.com on Flippa for $250,000. The post was about the trademark ramifications of the term, “retweet.” Apparently there are two pending trademark applications for the term.
The post details these applications and while I’m sure you’d love to read about all the legal mumbo jumbo, I’ll spare you the details. What’s important is that one of the applications was filed by Twitter and the other one wasn’t. Furthermore, the fact that there are pending applications indicates the term will likely be a registered trademark so where does that leave the buyer of Retweet.com from a legal stand point?
Well accordingly to the post, it might not matter. The author “guesses” that the buyer may in fact be Twitter themselves. How does the author come to that conclusion? Given the proximity of the status update of Twitter’s trademark application (March 1, 2010) and the sale of Retweet.com the following week, Twitter could very well be the buyer.
It makes sense to believe Twitter may be the buyer for a few reasons. One, purchasing a high-traffic domain and service so closely related to their own makes good business sense. Second, paying $250,000 for a domain that is getting 12 million monthly visitors is a drop in the bucket given the valuation of Twitter. Finally, as the author of the post points out, making such a purchase adds weight to their trademark application against the other applicant – giving them the edge in obtaining the trademark.
What Say You? Do You Believe Twitter Was The Buyer?
Sound Off In The Comments Below!









