Comments on: Website Flipping Market Snapshot: 7-4-10 http://www.flipwebsites.com/market-snapshot/website-flipping-market-snapshot-7-4-10/ How To Make Money Online Fast with Website Flipping Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:49:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Travis http://www.flipwebsites.com/market-snapshot/website-flipping-market-snapshot-7-4-10/#comment-730 Travis Wed, 07 Jul 2010 04:46:32 +0000 http://www.flipwebsites.com/?p=710#comment-730 Nice catch. I was going to mention that in my write up but then for some reason I left it out. I am surprised that when the seller relisted it sold for half what it did the first time around but then again the first deal fell through (presumably the buyer couldn't come up with the money) so technically it didn't sell for $52,600. Someone simply made a bid for that amount - no money was actually exchanged so no value was really established. Having said that, there were other bidders who were bidding in the $40,000's. Why didn't the seller approach the other bidders to see if they would be interested in buying at their highest bid? And why didn't they step up and bid the site up to that amount the second time around? Another question I have is why did the seller start the bidding at $41,000 the first time around and then drop it to a starting bid of $26,000 the second time around - especially when there were bidders bidding in the $40,000's the first time? Personally, I think the sale price the second time around is more in line with the site's true value given that the site is so new and doesn't have an established history of earnings. Travis Nice catch. I was going to mention that in my write up but then for some reason I left it out. I am surprised that when the seller relisted it sold for half what it did the first time around but then again the first deal fell through (presumably the buyer couldn’t come up with the money) so technically it didn’t sell for $52,600. Someone simply made a bid for that amount – no money was actually exchanged so no value was really established.

Having said that, there were other bidders who were bidding in the $40,000′s. Why didn’t the seller approach the other bidders to see if they would be interested in buying at their highest bid? And why didn’t they step up and bid the site up to that amount the second time around?

Another question I have is why did the seller start the bidding at $41,000 the first time around and then drop it to a starting bid of $26,000 the second time around – especially when there were bidders bidding in the $40,000′s the first time?

Personally, I think the sale price the second time around is more in line with the site’s true value given that the site is so new and doesn’t have an established history of earnings.

Travis

]]> By: Leads Generation http://www.flipwebsites.com/market-snapshot/website-flipping-market-snapshot-7-4-10/#comment-728 Leads Generation Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:45:25 +0000 http://www.flipwebsites.com/?p=710#comment-728 http://www.urgentcashtillpayday.co.uk/ - this was a relisting, the site "sold" in the previous auction for $52,600, almost for double the amount as this one. Any thoughts on this? http://www.urgentcashtillpayday.co.uk/ – this was a relisting, the site “sold” in the previous auction for $52,600, almost for double the amount as this one. Any thoughts on this?

]]>